Search: Site   Web
Say What? ~ Connecting the Deaf & Hard of Hearing of Y-S to the Community and Beyond

Archive for the 'About Deafhood' Category

A Poem by Deb Ann

October 22nd, 2007, 8:10 pm by

I’ve been getting to know another Deaf blogger named Deb Ann. Recently, she wrote a poem on her blog and invited me to read it. Innocent Deaf.

Deaf people can write and enjoy poetry. I remember writing poems in my creative writing classes. A few got published in newsletters but it’s been ages. Still, I enjoy reading poetry. In fact, one of my cherished favorites is Dante Alighieri’s The Inferno, part I of Divine Comedy.

American Sign Language users who blog or vlog, do not merely tell about their lives or issues; some have more creative outlets. Poetry, videos of them signing poetry or story, art, and much more. If you visit DeafRead.com’s Art and Storytelling category, you can see a listing of creative works as well.

Speaking of creative works, I think we need some more exposure to Deaf Art, so I will highlight a few in the next blog posts.

After the Cochlear Implant Video, Thoughts

August 6th, 2007, 7:36 pm by

By now you’ve most likely seen the video on this post Live broadcast of a Cochlear Implant surgery.

Interesting video of how a cochlear implant surgery is done, yes?

Some of you may not be aware that there is controversy over Cochlear Implants (CI for short).

Since FDA has changed the age limits for CI, this has meant that deaf babies as young as 6 months old can be implanted. A large number of medical professionals, audiologists and speech specialists advocate the use of the Auditory Verbal Therapy (AVT) with the CI. The Auditory Verbal Approach means daily, consistent training of deaf children in learning how to hear and speak over a period of months if not years. This approach is sponsored by organizations like Alexander Graham Bell Association for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing. AG Bell Academy Web site. Note their slogan “For listening and spoken language.”

A side note: Alexander Graham Bell is known for his invention of the telephone. He was also a Eugenicist whose ideas about people that he considered defective centered on the deaf. Ironically, he was married to a deaf woman and was a close friend of deaf-blind Helen Keller. Source: Wikipedia. Scroll down to the Eugenics section.

With the rise of CI being performed on deaf children, AVT has been on the rise as well. Also, there is an increasing popularity in teaching American Sign Language to hearing babies. Signing with your baby increases their linguistic acquisition, their intelligence, and makes communication with parents and children easier.

Yet I question: Why are deaf babies treated differently from hearing babies? Sign language is the native language of the deaf. Why do deaf children have to learn how to listen with their greatest weakness – hearing? Why have CI surgeries that may or may not restore enough hearing to be usable?

I find it interesting that deafness is a non-debilitating condition that is being operated on. The suffering that deaf people have comes from others denying them their native language (ASL) and Deafhood. I realize that there are parents who feel that implanting their deaf child is the best decision, and I have to respect that. However, if an implanted child is taught American Sign Language and Deafhood, that is better. Because an implanted child is still deaf, and American Sign Language is the only language that is 100% accessible for the deaf. Lip reading shows 30-35% of the English language. Hearing aids and CIs don’t always provide enough hearing to be dependable alone. A CI does not make a deaf baby hear the same as a hearing baby.

Discussion of language acquisition in babies brought about the Greatest Irony, which Amy Cohen Efron so well told through her vlog series that has been circulating on the deaf blogsphere. She has a updated copy with voice interpretation for the hearing. Video Link here.

I’ve always wanted to share this with my general audience because of our Deaf population here in the area. There is a desperate need for the public to understand the Deaf perspective. We have a Deaf and Hard of Hearing panel that fields questions from parents of Deaf/HoH children. CIs are generally viewed by the local Deaf community as not necessary for the clinically deaf child. If a deaf person is old enough to make the decision to get the CI, that is their personal decision. However, once a CI is implanted, it cannot be taken out unless there is a serious medical harm to the body.

I am aware that some people think that Deaf people are such angry people. If you think about it, Deaf people have a very good reason to be angry. They have had an epiphany. It is the realization that being deaf is not bad, and the only bad has been coming from people who view deafness in a negative light. My blog up to now, have featured stories and comments from living Deaf people who lead full lives, work, vote, and think about deep issues. There is nothing bad about being Deaf unless someone makes a big deal out of it.

A fellow Deaf vlogger said eloquently that without the emotion Anger to drive for changes, there would be no progression, no Deafhood, just like African-Americans and Womens’ rights fighting for equal civil rights. But the momentum must keep going until the word Audism (discrimination/prejudice of deafness) is no longer needed.

For Public Services

July 27th, 2007, 1:58 pm by

Ms. Kimberly Dethlefsen of Marysville Branch of NorCal Center on Deafness sent me this video. I want to put it up quickly here for sharing. It is good information for local public services in the Yuba-Sutter area. Click on the link below:

Community Emergency Preparedness Information Network Video

Addition:
Our local agency is Marysville branch of NorCal Center on Deafness. The headquarters is in Sacramento.
Contact List Here.

Cued Speech

June 12th, 2007, 9:36 pm by

Cued Speech Video on YouTube, click to view and be sure to read the comments for and against Cued Speech.

I saw this the other day on another blog through DeafRead.com. I’d never seen Cued Speech. I looked up information on it at Cued Speech. Cued Speech is a visual method using eight hand signs in four different positions around the mouth in a code to indicate what sound is being used. This method is being used on deaf children to the child with Down’s Syndrome in the Chicago area. The goal of this is to bridge the child to English literacy and the spoken language.

The poster claims that Cued Speech is not a replacement for ASL, and that Cued Speech users are able to acquire language faster. I just don’t understand why people were signing Cued Speech in the conversations. Is it a crutch?

I’ll admit Cued Speech looks bizarre. It is, after all, a code of sounds made visual.

Not to be mistaken as a sign language, Cued Speech merely tells how a word is supposed to be spoken. The real sign language is American Sign Language, which expresses all of the nuances of a true language — emotion, concepts, and linguistics — in a visual way. It is said ASL is like watching a movie and it is the greatest compliment I get when I tell a story in ASL. Cued Speech does not do this.

This brings us to the ages old debate of why the deaf and severely hard of hearing needs to speak. Why do deaf and severely hard of hearing children face great pressure to speak? What about those like me who are profoundly deaf and have no memory of hearing sounds?

Or is the truth something that no one really wants to admit but the Deaf are saying — that we’re speaking just so that our hearing counterparts will have an easier time accepting us?

Yes, I know this is most likely going to make a lot of advocates for speech and auditory therapy angry but hey, it has to be said. I am, after all, a production of Total Communication program — a combination of speech/auditory therapy, Signed Exacte English that became American Sign Language, and written English. I still remember the 11″ x 14″ yellow sheets where we had to break down sentences into their proper categories. Noun, pronoun, verb, adjective, etc. The deaf and hard of hearing are really guinea pigs for different methods of educating. Cued Speech is one of the latest experimentations.

I did notice, however, that all of the deaf in that video are children. I am curious about deaf adults. Did they succeed with Cued Speech?

The floor is open.

Response to a comment on deaf drivers

June 5th, 2007, 3:08 pm by

I found this in my blog’s comment queue today when I got back from my weekend. I wanted to post so that everyone can see it, rather than buried in an old post’s comments. This is for a post I wrote titled “You can’t do that! You’re deaf!

Anna Says:

I’m sure many of you are safe drivers, but not all deaf drivers should be on the road. A deaf driver smashed into me on my bike just six weeks ago. I suffered extensive injuries, spent two weeks in the hospital and have medical bills totally over 300K. I will be unable to walk for another three months. This man was not fit to have a drivers license. I’m not opposed to the deaf being licensed - I just think the standards for issuing licenses to the deaf should be tightened up so someone like the man who hit me is stopped from getting a license.

I wonder if deaf drivers have a more difficult time obtaining auto insurance…

Anna, I am sorry to hear about your accident. Without knowing the full story, I can’t really pass judgment. However, I don’t think deafness is the issue here. The driver’s competency sounds more like the key. Maybe he was not paying attention, which is a common mistake for all drivers both hearing and deaf. You do not mention whether his insurance is paying your medical bills. Was he insured?

As for making it harder for deaf drivers to be licensed, that is against civil rights. Driving is a privilege that is legally granted to all Americans, including deaf people. Deaf drivers go through the same testing as hearing drivers with an extra emphasis on being visual and aware of our surroundings. We don’t get special treatment. Same goes for insurance. Unfortunately, the privilege of driving depends on the driver keeping a good record.

I am of opinion that all drivers hearing, deaf, immigrant, young and old, need to be screened carefully when they take the driving test or get insurance. Deaf people should not be singled out to have a harder time getting automotive insurance just because they can’t hear. This kind of statement is discrimination. It’s same as telling a black person that he/she cannot drive or be insured because of the color of their skin, or that a woman can’t because of her gender. The same goes for granting or denying insurance. Legally, insurers are required to insure any driver who passes the driving tests and has a good record. If a deaf person can pass the driving tests, they have the right to be granted the priviledge of driving. It is up to the driver — both hearing and deaf — to maintain a good record. It’s bad drivers that should be looked at closely.

There are many bad drivers who are still driving and may not be licensed or insured. I have been hit by 3 drivers that should not have been driving. All 3 were hearing. Two were DUI. One DUI was not insured, and one was a hit-and-run driver that has never been caught to this day. The third one was an uninsured driver was also an immigrant fresh to America. And the DUI got his license back after serving punishment. Do I say “Those hearing drivers shouldn’t have licenses because they’re stupid for driving uninsured and under the influence!” or “Immigrants shouldn’t be driving!”

No.

They are just human beings who chose not to use their brains. My point is, deaf people are the same as hearing people. Driving depends on you paying attention to what you are doing, being aware of what is going on around you on the road, and driving responsibly. If you are capable of doing something that the average Joe can or better, you should be allowed to rather than being told you can’t do it because of a minor disability or the color of your skin, your gender, etc.

Anna, I really do hope you have a speedy recovery.

I invite comments on this from all of my readers.

He Said What?!

May 30th, 2007, 6:55 pm by

When I saw the blog post titled “Marlee Matlin responds to an Ignorant Hearing Blogger” on DeafRead.com, I was curious. Upon reading the original blog post by Mo Rocca in which he asks what Marlee Matlin was doing at American Idol (May 23rd), I couldn’t help but gasp, “He said what?!”

Thankfully, Marlee’s interpreter Jack Jason saw it and responded. Then Marlee responded. It went over alright because she responded in a professional way. It sounds like Mo Rocca learned quite a bit after that first post and the following storm of comments. If you’re wondering, Marlee was there to accompany her 11 year old daughter and yes, she enjoyed herself at the show.

I had to smile at Marlee’s remark to Kathy Griffin when Kathy asked her what she was doing there. Marlee responded in a deadpan way, “Shhh. Don’t tell anyone. I’ve been faking it all this time.” Kathy went silent for a bit before it hit her. Hahaha! I’ll admit to using that same retort when hearing people close to me ask me how I know they mispronounced my name. It totally throws them off, and I love the look of complete confusion on their faces. I really know by reading lips. “Hana” and “Hannah” have distinctly different lip shapes in addition to sounding different.

I have known since I was a child that deaf people can enjoy music, even play and write music. My parents had vinyl records of Beethoven’s music and would tell me that he was deaf and wrote beautiful music. I am also surrounded by musicians in my family and among friends. Personally, my musical preferences are in the heavy metal realm.

If you didn’t know there are modern deaf musicians, then this could be a treat. Deceased rock drummer Shawn Dale Barnette played for several bands like Alice in Chains, Guns ‘n Roses, and so on. He also wrote lyrics and had his own recording company. Shawn was fully deaf — born deaf. Evelyn Glennie is an internationally known deaf percussionist player who composes music. In another deaf community forum that I belong to, there are a few deaf members who are studying for their degree in music. Just Google for Deaf Musicians and you’ll be rewarded with a wealth of information, even information on schools of music for the deaf and hard of hearing.

Granted, there are some deaf people who aren’t interested in music at all, and that is their right. There are some hearing people who just aren’t crazy about music, too. Remember, we’re all diverse human beings.

Us Profile: Susan Stacy

May 22nd, 2007, 5:21 pm by

stacy.jpgPart of my contribution to the Appeal-Democrat newspaper is interviewing deaf/hard of hearing members of the Yuba-Sutter community. Susan Stacy is my second interview. First one was Kimberly Dethlefsen. I want to add some things to the original article published online here by the Appeal-Democrat because Susan Stacy is a woman of extensive experience it all couldn’t be fit into that article.

Susan Stacy has an interesting connection with me. Her husband and she bought the house that I lived in for the first 5 years of my life. She later met me when I was a little girl in the Lincrest Elementary School’s Special Education Program for the Deaf and Hard of Hearing. Since then, her family has maintained friendship with my family. She is also one of the core members of Deaf Club that meets every first Thursday of the month in Yuba City. She has a long history of working with deaf/hard of hearing children. Her husband is also deaf and a survivor of lung cancer. She remarked that nearly losing her husband was another life-changing experience after her experiences in Fiji. Her husband, Steven, has recently passed his one-year anniversary of being cancer-free. Their eldest daughter, Carita, is involved with the Deaf community and other community activities. She also is a front desk secretary/receptionist for NorCal Center on Deafness and occasionally is called on to interpret. Their younger daughter, Rose, is an interpreter for a deaf employee at CaISO in Folsom. Son Rex is currently employed by Wal-Mart in Citrus Heights.

During the interview, I learned that Susan had originally been brought up by the Oracy Method at Starr King Elementary School and latter learned ASL at 17 years old later at Del Campo High School. A deaf kid had transferred from Oregon, and didn’t like the Oracy Method so he taught Susan and the others ASL. She was also mainstreamed in all classes without an interpreter. She is a strong advocate of ASL as a primary language for deaf children and equal access for the deaf/hard of hearing. Her giving heart is not only for the deaf/hard of hearing but also those who have additional disabilities such as autism and ADHD.

Her trip to Fiji as a part of missionary work was a life experience for her. She got to see first hand what it is like for deaf people living outside America. Susan met deaf Fiji natives that bore hideous scars from being whipped or tortured for simply being deaf. She expressed a desire to go back and work with the Fiji deaf.

My conclusion: Susan Stacy is a woman of rich, diverse experiences.

* A note: Deafness and disability are viewed very differently in other countries; some are outright persecuted or simply declined full basic human rights. It is a scary fact that the United States of America and the United Kingdom are two of the few countries that recognize and grant equal access to the deaf and hard of hearing. Third world countries have it much worse; there is nothing governing the rights of the deaf/hard of hearing. This is why the World Federation of the Deaf exists.

Captioned Seatbelt Video

May 22nd, 2007, 2:19 pm by

Marysville Police Dept. Traffic Sgt. Dennis Hauck has been captioning his driving safety videos in his spare time. I am very impressed that he has done this for our deaf/hard of hearing audience. Driving safety is an important message for everyone.

Please click to jump to 10-8 On Duty and view the captioned Seat-belt safety video.

He does bring up a point that many other have said, why don’t public service messages automatically come with captioning? ADA and Captioning Law has not yet covered online video, streaming television, multimedia. It remains voluntary and suggested as a guideline for Web Accessibility.

However, a majority of foreign videos are subtitled. That’s more than can be said about our American videos. Sounds stupid, right? What can be done?

You have to be aggressive and push for captioning to be part of original works. National Association of the Deaf has been working on captioning for television, movie theaters, and Internet. But they need YOUR input to push this forward. At this moment, there is a pending action to ask the United States Senate to support telecommunication access that is going to be on the floor this July/August. It is called Advanced Telecommunications and Opportunity Reform Act. This includes captioning online, among all other Internet items like videophones.

Make your voice heard and counted. And enjoy the captioned video for Seat-belt Safety.

Audism and Deaf with a capital D

May 17th, 2007, 7:41 pm by

Audism? Don’t you mean Autism?

No, it’s not a typo. I recently polled several friends and co-workers, both deaf/hard of hearing and hearing, if they knew the word. No one had. It’s not yet in a dictionary, so I will tell you what it means.

I remember seeing the word a few times in other deaf forums and blogs but thought it was a typo until I began reading DeafRead.com some months ago. There is a category on DeafRead.com called Audism. A few of my blog posts ended up in their Audism category. Judging from the contents of my posts (example: “You can’t do that! You’re deaf!“)and others that were in the Audism category, I could tell it had something to do with a negative view of deafness, similar to a racist attitude. I Googled the word.

The Result: Gallaudet University’s Library web page definitions and history of the word. Be sure to click on the link to read the definitions. There were many Web pages with similar information, including Wikipedia.

In a nutshell: Audism is a view that a deaf person cannot lead a fulfilling and productive life. Audists also shun the deaf culture and the use of sign language, preferring instead lipreading, depending on residual hearing and speaking. Audists may be hearing or deaf.

The total opposite of audism is Deaf Pride. It means not being embarrassed that you are Deaf (with a capital D) and to express yourself fully in our native language — in our case, ASL. Deafness is a unique “disability” (quoted because to us it is not a disability), that has given rise to an entirely unique culture. Being part of the Deaf community means you are no longer alone: you share the same language, history, struggles, resources and a unique art. The difference is that in the Deaf community, we finally feel complete.

No more guessing what was said. No more wondering “How do I do this?” Never again feeling less of a human being just because you can’t hear too well or speak clearly. The Deaf person is finally free to understand, learn, express, share experiences, have access to resources and be part of a community. Deaf people and friends also work together to bring about changes in how the hearing community views deafness and in effect, end audism.

EDIT: May 18, 2007, 5:16 PM
Clarification: Some of my posts ended up in the Audism category because they were about an audistic experience. It does not mean I am audist. :)

ADVERTISEMENT 
ADVERTISEMENT 
powered by
google
Search
        Search: Web    Site